Manosh v. Lillian Cooper Apartments
Filing
5
DECISION & ORDER accepting and adopting the 4 Report and Recommendation in its entirety; and that the pltf's complaint (Dkt. No. 1) shall be DISMISSED without further Order of this Court, unless within 45 days of the date of this Decision & Order, pltf submits an Amended Complaint in accordance with Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report-Recommendation & this Decision & Order. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 1/23/2015. (see)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
_________________________________________
MICHAEL CLEMENT MANOSH,
Plaintiff,
6:14-CV-1484
(GTS/ATB)
v.
LILLIAN COOPER APARTMENTS
(LANDLORD),
Defendant.
_________________________________________
APPEARANCES:
MICHAEL CLEMENT MANOSH
Plaintiff, Pro Se
1430 Sunset Avenue, Apt. 1
Utica, New York 13502
GLENN T. SUDDABY, United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Currently before the Court, in the above-captioned civil rights action filed pro se by
Michael Clement Manosh (“Plaintiff”), is United States Magistrate Andrew T. Baxter’s ReportRecommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s Complaint be sua sponte dismissed for failure to
state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) unless,
within forty-five days of the date of the adoption of the Repot-Recommendation, Plaintiff files
an Amended Complaint that states a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Dkt. No. 4.)
Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Report-Recommendation and the deadline in which to
do so has expired. (See generally Docket Sheet.)
When no objection is made to a report-recommendation, the Court subjects that reportrecommendation to only a clear error review. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes:
1983 Addition. When performing such a “clear error” review, “the court need only satisfy itself
that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Id.;
see also Batista v. Walker, 94-CV-2826, 1995 WL 453299, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 31, 1995)
(Sotomayor, J.).
Here, based upon a careful review of this matter, the Court can find no clear error with
Magistrate Judge Baxter’s Report-Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 4.) Magistrate Judge Baxter
employed the proper legal standards, accurately recited the facts, and reasonably applied the law
to those facts. (Id.) As a result, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in its
entirety for the reasons stated therein. (Id.) The Court would add only that Plaintiff’s Amended
Complaint must be a complete pleading that will supersede his original Complaint in all respects
(and thus may not incorporate any portion of his original Complaint by reference).
ACCORDINGLY, it is
ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Baxter’s Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 4) is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) shall be DISMISSED without further
Order of this Court, unless within FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS of the date of this Decision and
Order, Plaintiff submits an Amended Complaint in accordance with Magistrate Judge Baxter’s
Report-Recommendation and this Decision and Order.
Dated: January 23, 2015
Syracuse, New York
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?