Hall v. Target Corporation
Filing
21
ORDER OF DISMISSAL BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT: The Court hereby ORDERS that this case is hereby DISMISSED and DISCONTINUED in its entirety, without costs, and without prejudice to the right of any party to reopen this action within thirty days of the da te of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. The Court further ORDERS that any application to reopen this case must be filed within thirty days of the date of this Order. The dismissal shall become with prejudice on the thirty-first day fol lowing the date of this Order, unless any party moves to reopen this case within thirty days of the date of this Order upon a showing that the settlement was not consummated, or the Court extends the thirty day period prior to its expiration. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. on 3/7/2017. (nmk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
____________________________________________________
KIMBERLY HALL,
Plaintiff,
v.
6:16-CV-988
(FJS/ATB)
TARGET CORPORATION,
Defendant.
____________________________________________________
ORDER OF DISMISSAL BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT
The Mediator has advised the Court that this action has settled or is in the process of
being settled. See Dkt. No. 19. A review of the Court's docket indicates that no infant or
incompetent is a party to this action. Accordingly, pursuant to N.D.N.Y. L.R. 68.2(a), the Court
hereby
ORDERS that the above-captioned case is hereby DISMISSED and DISCONTINUED
in its entirety, without costs, and without prejudice to the right of any party to reopen this action
within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated; and the
Court further
ORDERS that any application to reopen this case must be filed within thirty (30) days of
the date of this Order. An application to reopen filed after the expiration of that thirty-day
period, unless the Court has extended that period prior to its expiration, may be summarily
denied solely on the basis of untimeliness; and the Court further
ORDERS that, if the parties wish for the Court to retain ancillary jurisdiction for the
purpose of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit a request that the Court retain
jurisdiction over enforcement of the agreement or submit the agreement to the Court for
incorporation of its terms into an Order retaining jurisdiction within the above-referenced thirty
(30) day period for reopening this matter. The dismissal of the above-captioned action shall
become with prejudice on the thirty-first day following the date of this Order, unless any party
moves to reopen this case within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order upon a showing that
the settlement was not consummated, or the Court extends the thirty (30) day period prior to its
expiration; and the Court further
ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall close this case and serve a copy of this Order
on the parties pursuant to the Court's Local Rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 7, 2017
Syracuse, New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?