Shanks v. Burns et al

Filing 6

DECISION and ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1). ORDERED that, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 9/21/2017. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(mgh, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------BRADFORD L. SHANKS,
Plaintiff,
-v-

6:17-CV-719
(DNH/TWD)

BRIAN D. BURNS, Presiding Judge; JOHN
MUEHL, District Attorney; and OTSEGO
COUNTY, County Manager/Clerk,
Defendants.
-------------------------------APPEARANCES:
BRADFORD L. SHANKS
Plaintiff pro se
12 Fonda Avenue
Oneonta, NY 13820

DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Pro se plaintiff Bradford L. Shanks brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983. On July 24, 2017, the Honorable Therese Wiley Dancks, United States
Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed
with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon initial review. No objections to the ReportRecommendation have been filed.
Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the
Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is
ORDERED that
1. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and
2. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 21, 2017
Utica, New York.

-2-