Mead v. Commissioner of Social Security
DECISION and ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's 13 Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole; Therefore, it is ORDERED that, The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED; Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 10/14/2020. (mgh)
Case 6:19-cv-01169-DNH-ATB Document 14 Filed 10/14/20 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
OFFICE OF PETER W. ANTONOWICZ
Attorney for Plaintiff
148 West Dominick Street
Rome, NY 13440
PETER W. ANTONOWICZ, ESQ.
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Attorneys for Defendant
J.F.K. Federal Building, Room 625
15 New Sudbury Street
Boston, MA 02203
LUIS PERE, ESQ.
Special Ass't U.S. Attorney
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Plaintiff Keith M. filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the
Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for Supplemental Security Income.
By Report-Recommendation dated September 14, 2020, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter,
United States Magistrate Judge, advised that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed, and
Case 6:19-cv-01169-DNH-ATB Document 14 Filed 10/14/20 Page 2 of 2
plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been
Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the
Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C.
Therefore, it is
1. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED;
2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY; and
3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 14, 2020
Utica, New York.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?