FedEx Customer Information Services, Inc. v. Leslee Sports, Inc. et al

Filing 46

DECISION AND ORDER dismissing the Fourth-Party Complaint against Deft Yehuda Goldman for Lack of Prosecution. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 7/12/2010. (amt) [non-ecf participant(s) served via reg. mail]

Download PDF
FedEx Customer Information Services, Inc. v. Leslee Sports, Inc. et al Doc. 46 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------FEDEX CUSTOMER INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. 7:07-cv-875 LESLEE SPORTS, INC., and TRI-REGENCY WAREHOUSE PROPERTIES, INC. Defendants. -------------------------------LESLEE SPORTS, INC., and TRI-REGENCY WAREHOUSE PROPERTIES, INC., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL SILBERBERG, and ROBERT JUSKOVIC a/k/a ROBERT JUSKO d/b/a W ORLD CLOSEOUTS AND SURPLUS, Third-Party Defendants. ---------------------------------ROBERT JUSKOVIC a/k/a ROBERT JUSKO d/b/a W ORLD CLOSEOUTS AND SURPLUS, Fourth-Party Plaintiffs, v. YEHUDA GOLDMAN, a/k/a KEVIN GOLDMAN, et al, Fourth-Party Defendant. ----------------------------------- Dockets.Justia.com THOMAS J. McAVOY Senior United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER On May 25, 2010, the Court issued a Notice indicating that it appeared that service of the fourth-party complaint had not been effectuated and that the action had not been diligently prosecuted against Fourth-Party Defendant Yehuda Goldman. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and Local Rule 41.2, Fourth-Party Plaintiffs Michael Silberberg and Robert Juskovich were directed to show cause why the matter should not be dismissed against Yehuda Goldman. There being no response to the Court's notice and no indication that service has been effectuated or this matter otherwise diligently prosecuted against the Fourth-Party Defendant, the Fourth-Party Complaint against Defendant Yehuda Goldman is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:July 12, 2010 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?