Yoder, et al v. Town of Morristown, et al

Filing 30

Letter Motion from Lori H. Windham for Urie Hershberger, Menno L. Glick, Andy A. Miller, Dannie L. Swartzentruber, Mosie Swartzentruber, Levi Yoder, Peter D. Swartzentruber, Harvey Miller, Mose Miller, Jonas Zook, Sam Zook, John L. Hershberger, Menno S. Hershberger requesting Excuse from In-Person Attendance submitted to Judge Lowe. (Windham, Lori)

Download PDF
Yoder, et al v. Town of Morristown, et al Doc. 30 BOARD OF ADVISORS Hon. William P. Barr Former Attorney General of the United States Prof. Stephen L. Carter Yale Law School His Eminence Francis Cardinal George, O.M.I., Archbishop of Chicago Hon. Orrin G. Hatch United States Senator Prof. Douglas Laycock University of Michigan Law School Rev. Richard John Neuhaus President, Institute of Religion and Public Life August 11, 2009 Via ECF Honorable George H. Lowe United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court Northern District of New York 100 S. Clinton Street Syracuse, New York 13261 Re: Your Honor: Plaintiffs petition this court pursuant to Local Rule 83.12-6(f) that they be excused from in-person attendance at the ENE session scheduled for August 20, 2009. Attendance would work an extraordinary and unjustifiable hardship on the Plaintiffs, who have made alternative arrangements (described below) which will allow them to participate in the conference. In-person attendance by each of the thirteen Plaintiffs would cause extraordinary or unjustifiable hardship, as stated in L.R. 83.12-6(f). As the Court is aware, all Plaintiffs are members of the Swartzentruber Old Order Amish religious group. As such, Plaintiffs do not travel by modern transportation, including planes and automobiles. See Cmplt. ¶¶ 40, 44. Plaintiffs travel long distances only by bus or train, and a bus or train trip from Morristown to Albany and back would be a multi-day undertaking. This travel is further complicated by the fact that Plaintiffs do not stay in modern hotels or motels, and would need to find Amish lodging nearby. Because no evaluators are located in Morristown, or within horse and buggy distance of Morristown, this conflict is inevitable in the ENE process. Multiday travel for attendance at a two-hour ENE session would be an extraordinary hardship on the Plaintiffs, far greater than that imposed on any party who uses modern methods of transportation. Yoder, et al. v. Town of Morristown, et al., Case No: 09-cv-00007 Eunice Kennedy Shriver Founder and Honorary Chairman, Special Olympics International Sargent Shriver Chairman of the Board, Special Olympics International Dr. Ronald B. Sobel Senior Rabbi, Congregation Emanu-El of the City of New York John M. Templeton, Jr., M.D. Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 1350 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 605 Washington, DC 20036-1735 Phone: 202-955-0095 Fax: 202-955-0090 www.becketfund.org Dockets.Justia.com Plaintiffs wish to participate in the ENE process and have therefore made alternative arrangements for the ENE. The Bishops and Building Committee, who have decisionmaking authority for all the Plaintiffs, will be meeting together at one of their homes on August 20th. One of their attorneys will be present at that meeting and available by telephone to communicate with those attending the ENE. In this manner, the Plaintiffs can respond to questions and requests from the Evaluator, communicate their own questions, and evaluate and respond to any settlement proposals. Because Plaintiffs are able to make the alternative arrangements which will allow them to participate in the conference, it would be an unjustifiable hardship to require them to engage in multi-day travel in order to attend the ENE. Should the Court require further information, Plaintiffs will be happy to provide further factual background and briefing on this subject. Sincerely, Lori H. Windham Counsel for Plaintiffs cc: Gregg T. Johnson Christopher R. Lemire Jacinda Hall Conboy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?