Kemp v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

ORDER adopting the 18 Report and Recommendation. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and complaint is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Norman A. Mordue on 8/31/11. (jlr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________ GEORGETTE KEMP, Plaintiff, vs. 7:10-cv-1244 (NAM/ATB) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, N Defendant. ________________________________________________ OF COUNSEL: Conboy, McKay Law Firm 307 State Street Carthage, NY 13619 Attorney for Plaintiff A APPEARANCES: Lawrence D. Hasseler, Esq. Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel Region II 26 Federal Plaza - Room 3904 New York, New York 10278 Attorney for Defendant Maria P. Fragassi Santangelo, Esq. Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Norman A. Mordue, Chief U. S. District Judge M ORDER The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation1 by Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter, duly filed on the 11th day of August 2011. Following fourteen (14) days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. 1 The matter was referred to Magistrate Baxter by the undersigned, not by the Honorable Gary L. Sharpe, as noted in the first paragraph of the Report-Recommendation. After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge’s ReportRecommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety. 2. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and complaint is DISMISSED.. 3. The Clerk is directed to close the case and enter judgment accordingly. N 4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 31, 2011 Syracuse, New York A M 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?