Groves v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

ORDER - That the 14 Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece filed October 1, 2014 is ACCEPTED in its entirety. That Defendant's 11 Motion to Dismiss is granted and this action is dismissed as untimely filed. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 10/29/2014. (jel, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------MICHAEL LYNN GROVES Plaintiff, -v.Civil Action No. 7:12-cv-904 (GLS/RFT) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR THE PLAINTIFF: Office of Christine A. Scofield 506 East Washington Street Suite D Syracuse, New York 13202 CHRISTINE A. SCOFIELD FOR THE DEFENDANT: Social Security Administration Office of Regional General Counsel Region II 26 Federal Plaza - Room 3904 New York, New York 10278 SIXTINA FERNANDEZ, ESQ. GARY L. SHARPE, CHIEF JUDGE ORDER The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation by Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece, duly filed October 1, 2014. Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece filed October 1, 2014 (Dkt. No. 14) is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 11) is granted and this action is dismissed as untimely filed; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk close this case and provide a copy of this Order to the parties in accordance to the local rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 29, 2014 Albany, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?