Noble v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

ORDER - That the 19 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Earl S. Hines filed February 27, 2015 is ACCEPTED in its entirety. That the Commissioner's decision denying disability-based benefits is AFFIRMED and Noble's complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 3/25/2015. (jel, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------EDWARD NOBLE Plaintiff, -v.Civil Action No. 7:13-cv-1443 (GLS/ESH) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR THE PLAINTIFF: Conboy, McKay Law Firm 307 State Street Carthage, New York 13619 LAWRENCE D. HASSELER, ESQ. FOR THE DEFENDANT: Social Security Administration Office of Regional General Counsel Region II 26 Federal Plaza - Room 3904 New York, New York 10278 GRAHAM MORRISON, ESQ. GARY L. SHARPE, CHIEF JUDGE ORDER The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation by Magistrate Judge Earl S. Hines, duly filed February 27, 2015. Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Earl S. Hines filed February 27, 2015 (Dkt. No. 19) is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and it is further ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision denying disability-based benefits is AFFIRMED and Noble’s complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk close this case and provide a copy of this Order to the parties in accordance to the local rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 25, 2015 Albany, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?