Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Meunier et al
Filing
12
DECISION AND ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 11) for default judgment is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that if Plaintiff wishes to file a new motion for default judgment, the motion must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules and be filed within thirty (30) days after the entry of this Decision and Order; and it is further ORDERED, that if Plaintiff does not file a new, conforming motion within thirty (30) days, this action will be DISMISSED with prejudice without further order of the Court, and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 30, 2016. (sas)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
-against-
7:15-CV-1334 (LEK/TWD)
DONALD J. MEUNIER, et al.
Defendants.
DECISION and ORDER
I.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action on November 15,
2015, alleging that Defendants 3M 2P, Inc. d/b/a Rio Music Theater a/k/a Rio (“3M 2P”) and
Donald J. Meunier, individually and as an officer, director, shareholder and/or principal of 3M 2P
(collectively, “Defendants”) illegally obtained and exhibited “UFC 173: Barao v. Dillashaw” (“UFC
173”) on May 24, 2014, in violation of 47 U.S.C. §§ 605 and 553. Dkt. No. 1 (“Complaint”).
Plaintiff has filed a Motion for default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b).
Dkt. No. 11 (“Motion”). For the following reasons, the Motion is denied without prejudice.
II.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff is a distributor of sports and entertainment programming to commercial
establishments. Dkt. No. 11-1 (“Memorandum”) at 2. After entering into an agreement with the
promoter of the event, Plaintiff was given exclusive rights to license the exhibition of UFC 173 to
commercial establishments, such as restaurants, bars, and casinos. Compl. ¶ 14. In an effort to
combat piracy of programs such as UFC 173, Plaintiff hired auditors to visit locations that had not
contracted with Plaintiff to broadcast the event. Dkt. No. 11-2 (“Joe Hand Affidavit”) at 2.
On May 24, 2014, an auditor hired by Plaintiff entered the Defendants’ establishment after
paying a ten-dollar cover charge. Dkt. No. 11-3 (“Piracy Affidavit”). Thereafter, the auditor
witnessed UFC 173 being displayed on one large television to between fifty and seventy-five
patrons. Id. Additionally, Plaintiff submitted screenshots of Defendants’ social media page, which
advertised the broadcast of UFC 173 and other similar UFC events to which Plaintiff had exclusive
rights. See Dkt. No. 11-7 (“Exhibit A”). Defendants did not have a contract with Plaintiff to
broadcast the event, and therefore Plaintiff alleges unlawful interception, receipt, and exhibition of
UFC 173. Compl. ¶ 17. Plaintiff also asserts that there is no means by which Defendants could
have obtained UFC 173 accidentally, as some overt action is required to descramble the signal. See
Compl. ¶ 18; Mem. at 4.
After unsuccessful attempts by Plaintiff to resolve the matter at hand informally, Plaintiff
initiated this action, seeking damages under 47 U.S.C. §§ 605 or 553. Compl. ¶ 30. Defendant did
not file a responsive pleading, and on January 26, 2016, the Clerk filed an Entry of default against
Defendant at Plaintiff’s request. See Dkt. Nos. 8; 9. On February 26, 2016, Plaintiff filed the
instant Motion for default judgment. Mot. Plaintiff seeks damages totaling $60,590.00 in the
aggregate, which includes statutory damages, enhanced statutory damages, and costs. Mem. at 6-12.
III.
LEGAL STANDARD
“Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 provides a two-step process that the Court must follow
before it may enter a default judgment against a defendant.” Elec. Creations Corp. v. Gigahertz,
Inc., No. 12-CV-1423, 2013 WL 3229125, at *3 (N.D.N.Y. June 25, 2013) (quoting Robertson v.
Doe, No. 05-CV-7046, 2008 WL 2519894, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. June 19, 2008)). “First, under Rule
55(a), when a party fails to plead or otherwise defend . . . the clerk must enter the party’s default.”
2
Id. Second, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2), “the party seeking default judgment is
required to present its application for entry of judgment to the court.” Id.
“When a default is entered, the defendant is deemed to have admitted all of the well-pleaded
factual allegations in the complaint pertaining to liability.” Bravado Int’l Grp. Merch. Servs., Inc. v.
Ninna, Inc., 655 F. Supp. 2d 177, 188 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) (citing Greyhound Exhibitgroup, Inc. v. E.L.
U.L. Realty Corp., 973 F.2d 155, 158 (2d Cir. 1992)). “While a default judgment constitutes an
admission of liability, the quantum of damages remains to be established by proof unless the amount
is liquidated or susceptible of mathematical computation.” Flaks v. Koegel, 504 F.2d 702, 707 (2d
Cir. 1974); see also Bravado Int’l, 655 F. Supp. 2d at 189. “[E]ven upon default, a court may not
rubber-stamp the non-defaulting party’s damages calculation, but rather must ensure that there is a
basis for the damages that are sought.” Robertson, 2008 WL 2519894, at *3. “The burden is on the
plaintiff to establish its entitlement to recovery.” Bravado Int’l, 655 F. Supp. 2d at 189. “While
‘the court must ensure that there is a basis for the damages specified in a default judgment, it may,
but need not, make the determination through a hearing.’” Id. at 190.
Under Local Rule 55.2(b), the moving party must submit with its motion for default
judgment: (1) a clerk’s certificate of entry of default; (2) a proposed form of default judgment; (3) a
copy of the pleading to which no response has been made; and (4) an affidavit. L.R. 55.2(b). The
affidavit must set forth that: (1) the party against whom judgment is sought is not an infant,
incompetent, or in military service; (2) the party against whom judgment is sought has defaulted in
appearance in the action; (3) service was properly effected under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4;
(4) the amount sought is justly due and owing, and no part has been paid; and (5) the disbursements
sought to be taxed have been made in the action or will necessarily be made or incurred.
3
L.R. 55.2(a).
IV.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 55.2(b), which requires the moving party to
submit a copy of the pleading to which no response was made. L.R. 55.2(b). Plaintiff did not
submit a copy of the Complaint with its Motion for default judgment. Mot. If Plaintiff wishes to
file a new motion for default judgment, it must do so within thirty (30) days after the entry of this
Decision and Order. Plaintiff’s new motion must conform to the requirements of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules, and must contain the supporting documentation required by
statute and rule. Failure to file a conforming motion will result in dismissal of this action with
prejudice.
V.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that Plaintiff’s Motion (Dkt. No. 11) for default judgment is DENIED; and it
is further
ORDERED, that if Plaintiff wishes to file a new motion for default judgment, the motion
must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules and be filed within
thirty (30) days after the entry of this Decision and Order; and it is further
ORDERED, that if Plaintiff does not file a new, conforming motion within thirty (30)
days, this action will be DISMISSED with prejudice without further order of the Court, and the
Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Decision and Order on Plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
DATED:
June 30, 2016
Albany, NY
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?