Doctor's Associates Inc. v. Neverett et al

Filing 38

JUDGMENT DISMISSING CASE BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT The Court will retain jurisdiction to vacate this order upon good cause shown that settlement has not been completed and that further litigation is necessary.. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 3/30/2012. (bjw, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________ DOCTOR’S ASSOCIATES Inc. Plaintiff, Civil Action: 8:08-CV-735 (FJS/DRH) vs. MARILYN M. NEVERETT; JOHN R. NEVERETT Defendants. ____________________________________ OF COUNSEL: APPEARANCES: FOR PLAINTIFF Heslin, Rothenberg Law Firm 5 Columbia Circle Albany, New York 12203 Shanna K. Sanders, Esq. Nicholas Mesiti, Esq. FOR DEFENDANTS: O’Connell, Aronowitz Law Firm 206 West Bay Plaza Plattsburgh, New York 12901 Erin R. Mindoro, Esq. William A. Favreau, Esq. FREDERICK J. SCULLIN, JR. SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT The parties have entered into an agreement in settlement of all claims in this action, and that they reasonably anticipate finalizing their agreement within 30 days, following which this action will be discontinued by stipulation pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Based upon this development, it is no longer necessary for this action to remain on the court’s active docket. It is therefore hereby ORDERED that 1) This action is dismissed, with prejudice, except as set forth below. 2) The court will retain complete jurisdiction to vacate this order and to reopen the action within two months from the date of this order upon good cause shown that the settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary. 3) The Clerk shall forthwith serve copies of this judgment upon the parties and/or their attorneys appearing in this action by electronic means. Dated: March 30, 2012 Syracuse, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?