Skiff v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 34

ORDER OF DISMISSAL BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT: The Court hereby ORDERS that this case is hereby dismissed and discontinued in its entirety, without costs, and without prejudice to the right of any party to reopen this action within 30 days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. The Court further ORDERS that any application to reopen this action must be filed within 30 days of the date of this Order. The Court further ORDERS that the dismissal of this action shall become with prejudice on the thirty-first day following the date of this Order, unless any party moves to reopen this action within 30 days of the date of this Order upon a showing that the settlement was not consummated, or the Court extends the 30 day period prior to its expiration. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. on 6/1/2017. (nmk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _______________________________________________ CHRISTOPHER R. SKIFF, Plaintiff, v. 8:16-CV-1375 (FJS/DJS) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant. _______________________________________________ ORDER OF DISMISSAL BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT Plaintiff has advised the Court that the parties have settled or are in the process of settling this action. See Dkt. No. 33. A review of the Court's docket indicates that no infant or incompetent person is a party to this action. Accordingly, pursuant to N.D.N.Y. L.R. 68.2(a), the Court hereby ORDERS that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed and discontinued in its entirety, without costs, and without prejudice to the right of any party to reopen this action within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated; and the Court further ORDERS that any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. An application to reopen filed after the expiration of this thirty (30) day period, unless the Court extends that period prior to its expiration, may summarily be denied solely on the basis of untimeliness; and the Court further ORDERS that, if the parties wish for the Court to retain ancillary jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit a request that the Court retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the agreement or submit the agreement to the Court for incorporation of its terms into an Order retaining jurisdiction within the above-referenced thirty (30) day period for reopening this action; and the Court further ORDERS that the dismissal of the above-captioned action shall become with prejudice on the thirty-first day following the date of this Order, unless any party moves to reopen this action within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order upon a showing that the settlement was not consummated, or the Court extends the thirty (30) day period prior to its expiration; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall close this action and serve a copy of this Order on the parties pursuant to the Court's Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 1, 2017 Syracuse, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?