Douglas v. Smith et al

Filing 105

JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT: This case is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice to reopening upon motion of any party within 30 days of the date of the filing of this order upon a showing that the settlement was not consummated; and the dismissal shall become with prejudice on the thirty-first day after the filing of this order. (lmw) (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------ELLIS DOUGLAS, Plaintiff, v. M. KETZER, Corr. Officer; R. CROSS, Corr. Officer; G. KARASMANOS, Corr. Officer; M. SUTTON, Corr. Officer; McGUIRE, Corr. Officer, Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------------------No. 9:05-CV-1000 (GTS/DRH) JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT The Court has been advised by United States Magistrate Judge David R. Homer that the parties in the above-captioned case have reported to him that the case has been settled. Counsel has also advised Judge Homer that no infant or incompetent is a party to this action. Accordingly, pursuant to N.D.N.Y.L.R. 68.2(a), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The above-captioned case is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety without prejudice to re-opening upon the motion of any party within thirty (30) days of the date of the filing of this order upon a showing that the settlement was not consummated; 2. The dismissal of the above-captioned case shall become with prejudice on the thirty-first day after the date of the filing of this order unless any party moves to re-open this case within thirty (30) days of the date of the filing of this order upon a showing that the settlement was not consummated; and 3. The Clerk shall forthwith serve this Judgment upon the attorneys for the parties appearing in this action by electronic mail. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 6, 2009 Albany, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?