Abdullah v. Goord et al

Filing 49

ORDER that 47 Report and Recommendations is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED that 38 Motion to Dismiss is granted. ORDERED that plaintiff's remaining claims in this action be DISMISSED IN THEIR ENTIRETY. Signed by Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 2/1/08. (nas)

Download PDF
Abdullah v. Goord et al Doc. 49 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JARQUAY AZZAM ABDULLAH, Plaintiff, -againstGLENN S. GOORD, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 9:06-CV-0622 (LEK/DEP) DECISION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on November 7, 2007, by the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 47). Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Peebles' Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 47) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendant Everlath's Motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claims against her (Dkt. No. 38) be GRANTED; and it is further 1 Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED, that Plaintiff's remaining claims in this action be DISMISSED in their Entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 01, 2008 Albany, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?