Harvey v. Correction Officers 1 through 6 et al
Filing
98
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that in the above en titled action, the Report-Recommendation of the Honorable ThrseWiley Dancks, dated March 18, 2014, is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is DISMISSE D and judgment is entered in favor of the defendants as against the plaintiff, in accordance with the DECISION and ORDER of the Honorable Lawrence E. Kahn, U. S. District Judge, dated June 19, 2014. (ptm) (Copy served on petitioner by regular mail)
===============================================================================
* * * * * UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT * * * * *
NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
DOCKET NO: 9:09-CV-0517 (LEK/TWD)
GREGORY HARVEY,
Plaintiff,
-against-
CORRECTIONS OFFICERS 1-6, et al.,
Defendants.
JURY VERDICT. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and
the jury has rendered its verdict.
XX
DECISION by COURT. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that in the above entitled action, the Report-Recommendation of the Honorable Thérèse
Wiley Dancks, dated March 18, 2014, is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the
case is DISMISSED and judgment is entered in favor of the defendants as against the plaintiff, in accordance with the DECISION
and ORDER of the Honorable Lawrence E. Kahn, U. S. District Judge, dated June 19, 2014.
DATE:
June 19, 2014
LAWRENCE K. BAERMAN
CLERK OF THE COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?