Warren v. Corcoran et al
Filing
37
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment 33 is GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 11/17/2011. (ptm) (Copy served on plaintiff by regular mail)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------EVAN WARREN,
Plaintiff,
-v-
9:09-CV-1146
MICHAEL CORCORAN; SUE LENNOX;
J. BIGGAR; L. JOHNSON; D. CRULL;
C. BURGIN; and J. KEISER,
Defendants.
-------------------------------APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
EVAN WARREN, 06-B-2142
Plaintiff, pro se
Clinton Correctional Facility
Box 2002
Dannemora, NY 12929
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General for the State of New York
Attorney for Defendant
The Capitol
Albany, NY 12224
C. HARRIS DAGUE, ESQ.
Ass't Attorney General
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Plaintiff brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. On October
20, 2011, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, advised, by
Report-Recommendation, that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted and the
complaint dismissed in its entirety. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.
Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the
Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C.
636(b)(1).
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that
1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; and
2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 17, 2011
Utica, New York.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?