Miles v. Albany Correctional Facility et al

Filing 39

DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the 35 Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY. ORDERED, that Defendant Albany Correctional Facility's 15 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 10/6/10. (Decision and Order served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )

Download PDF
Miles v. Albany Correctional Facility et al Doc. 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES T. MILES, Plaintiff, -againstALBANY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendant. 9:09-CV-1279 (LEK/ATB) DECISION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on September 16, 2010, by the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 35). Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1 of the Northern District of New York. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 35) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED, that Defendant Albany Correctional Facility's Motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 15) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 06, 2010 Albany, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?