Triplett v. Rendle et al
Filing
75
ORDER: ORDERED that: 1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety. 2. The Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 42 ) is denied. 3. The Plaintiff's request to voluntarily dismiss defendant Leclaire (Dkt. No. 69 ) is granted. Signed by Judge Norman A. Mordue on 3/16/2012. (ptm) (Copy served on plaintiff by regular mail)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________
OMAR TRIPLETT,
Plaintiff,
v.
9:09-CV-1396
(NAM/TWD)
N
SGT. RENDLE, SGT. R. MYERS,
C.O. D. BARRIERE, C.O. D. BEANE,
C.O. MOAK, C.O. J. VARIN,
SGT. SNOW, C.O. L. BEZIO,
SGT. LECLAIRE,
Defendants.
________________________________________________
APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
A
Omar Triplett
01-A-2100
Five Points Correctional Facility
Caller Box 119
Romulus, NY 14541
Plaintiff, pro se
M
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Office of the Attorney General
State of New York
Department of Law
The Capitol
Albany, NY 12224
Counsel for Defendants
BRIAN J. O’DONNELL, ESQ.
Assistant Attorney General
NORMAN A. MORDUE, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER
The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge
George H. Lowe, duly filed on the 9th day of February 2012. Following fourteen (14) days from
the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the
parties herein.
After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge’s ReportRecommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety.
2. The Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 42) is denied.
N
3. The Plaintiff’s request to voluntarily dismiss defendant Leclaire (Dkt. No. 69) is
granted.
4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the
Magistrate Judge assigned to this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
A
Dated: March 16, 2012
Syracuse, New York
M
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?