Triplett v. Rendle et al

Filing 75

ORDER: ORDERED that: 1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety. 2. The Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 42 ) is denied. 3. The Plaintiff's request to voluntarily dismiss defendant Leclaire (Dkt. No. 69 ) is granted. Signed by Judge Norman A. Mordue on 3/16/2012. (ptm) (Copy served on plaintiff by regular mail)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________ OMAR TRIPLETT, Plaintiff, v. 9:09-CV-1396 (NAM/TWD) N SGT. RENDLE, SGT. R. MYERS, C.O. D. BARRIERE, C.O. D. BEANE, C.O. MOAK, C.O. J. VARIN, SGT. SNOW, C.O. L. BEZIO, SGT. LECLAIRE, Defendants. ________________________________________________ APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: A Omar Triplett 01-A-2100 Five Points Correctional Facility Caller Box 119 Romulus, NY 14541 Plaintiff, pro se M HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Office of the Attorney General State of New York Department of Law The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 Counsel for Defendants BRIAN J. O’DONNELL, ESQ. Assistant Attorney General NORMAN A. MORDUE, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge George H. Lowe, duly filed on the 9th day of February 2012. Following fourteen (14) days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge’s ReportRecommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety. 2. The Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 42) is denied. N 3. The Plaintiff’s request to voluntarily dismiss defendant Leclaire (Dkt. No. 69) is granted. 4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. A Dated: March 16, 2012 Syracuse, New York M 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?