O'Sullivan v. Fischer

Filing 14

DECISION AND ORDER: Ordered, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY. ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Dkt. No. 12 ) is GRANTED with leave to amend within thirty days of this order. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 9/8/11. (Served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THOMAS O’SULLIVAN, Plaintiff, -against- 9:10-CV-0440 (LEK/GHL) BRIAN FISCHER, Defendant. DECISION and ORDER This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on August 15, 2011 by the Honorable George H. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 13). Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge’s Report-Recommendation, the party “may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations,” FED . R. CIV . P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Magistrate Judge Lowe’s ReportRecommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly; it is hereby ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants’ Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Dkt. No. 12) is GRANTED with leave to amend within thirty days of this order; and it is further 1 ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 08, 2011 Albany, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?