Louis-Charles v. Courtwright et al

Filing 39

ORDER: ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks filed January 7, 2014 (Dkt. No. 38 ) is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and it is further ORDERED that defendants' motion for summa ry judgment (Dkt. No. 30 ) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is to mail copies of the Order to the parties in accordance with the court's local rules. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 2/4/2014. (ptm) (Copy served on plaintiff by regular mail)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------SAMUEL LOUIS-CHARLES
Plaintiff,
-v.Civil Action No.
9:11-cv-147 (GLS/TWD)
SERGEANT COURTWRIGHT, et al.
Defendants.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPEARANCES:

OF COUNSEL:

FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
SAMUEL LOUIS-CHARLES
Plaintiff Pro Se
232 West Main St.
Apt. #36
Watertown, New York 13601
FOR DEFENDANTS:
Jefferson County Attorney
Jefferson County Office Building
175 Arsenal Street
Watertown, New York 13601

DAVID J. PAULSEN, ESQ.

GARY L. SHARPE,
CHIEF JUDGE

ORDER
The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks, duly filed

January 7, 2014. Following fourteen (14) days from the service thereof, the
Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties
herein.
No objections having been filed and the court having reviewed the
Magistrate Judge’s Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge
Therese Wiley Dancks filed January 7, 2014 (Dkt. No. 38) is ACCEPTED in
its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and it is further
ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No.
30) is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants; and it is
further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is to mail copies of the Order to
the parties in accordance with the court’s local rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

February 4, 2014
Albany, New York

2