Rounds v. Thompson et al

Filing 41

ORDER: ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks filed December 17, 2013 (Dkt. No. 40 ) is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons state therein. ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 1/15/14. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------WILLIAM ROUNDS Plaintiff, -v.Civil Action No. 9:12-cv-953 (GLS/TWD) C.O. THOMPSON, CORRECTION OFFICER, et al. Defendants. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR THE PLAINTIFF: WILLIAM ROUNDS Plaintiff Pro Se 8 Pine Ridge Circle North Syracuse, New York 13212 FOR DEFENDANT THOMPSON: Sheehan, Greene Law Firm 54 State Street, Suite 1001 Albany, New York 12207 LAWRENCE H. SCHAEFER, ESQ. THOMAS D. LATIN, ESQ. GARY L. SHARPE, CHIEF JUDGE ORDER The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks, duly filed December 17, 2013. Following fourteen (14) days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. No objections having been filed and the court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks filed December 17, 2013 (Dkt. No. 40) is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons state therein; and it is further ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to prosecute; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is to mail copies of the Order to the parties in accordance with the court’s local rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 15, 2014 Albany, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?