Rounds v. Thompson et al
Filing
41
ORDER: ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks filed December 17, 2013 (Dkt. No. 40 ) is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons state therein. ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 1/15/14. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------WILLIAM ROUNDS
Plaintiff,
-v.Civil Action No.
9:12-cv-953 (GLS/TWD)
C.O. THOMPSON, CORRECTION
OFFICER, et al.
Defendants.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
WILLIAM ROUNDS
Plaintiff Pro Se
8 Pine Ridge Circle North
Syracuse, New York 13212
FOR DEFENDANT THOMPSON:
Sheehan, Greene Law Firm
54 State Street, Suite 1001
Albany, New York 12207
LAWRENCE H. SCHAEFER, ESQ.
THOMAS D. LATIN, ESQ.
GARY L. SHARPE,
CHIEF JUDGE
ORDER
The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks, duly filed
December 17, 2013. Following fourteen (14) days from the service thereof,
the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the
parties herein.
No objections having been filed and the court having reviewed the
Magistrate Judge’s Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge
Therese Wiley Dancks filed December 17, 2013 (Dkt. No. 40) is
ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons state therein; and it is further
ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure
to prosecute; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is to mail copies of the Order to
the parties in accordance with the court’s local rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 15, 2014
Albany, New York
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?