Shabazz v. Howard et al
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 96 ) is accepted in its entirety. ORDERED that defendants' motion (Dkt. No. 90 ) for partial summary judgment is granted. ORDERED that any and all cla ims against the remaining defendants in their official capacities are dismissed with prejudice. ORDERED that all claims against defendant Douyon de Azevedo (sued as Mario D'Acevedo) are dismissed with prejudice. ORDERED that all claims against Jerry Roe are dismissed without prejudice. ORDERED that the case will proceed solely on the Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against defendants T. Howard; R. Rhondo; and B. Burdett in their individual capacities. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to correct the docket to indicate that John Doe was terminated as a defendant on March 18, 2014 (Dkt. No. 11). Signed by Senior Judge Norman A. Mordue on 6/1/17. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Michael Aziz Zarif Shabazz, also known as
Michael A. Hurley,
Plaintiff,
-v-
9:12-CV-1372 (NAM/TWD)
N
T. Howard; R. Rhondo; B. Burdett; Dabiew;
Velie; D. Dumas; Lacy; Candi Atkinson; Mario
D’Acevedo; Rock; Lucien J. LeClaire; Richard
Roy; John Doe; Brian Fischer; Jerry “Roe”;
and Richard “Roe,”
Defendants.
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
APPEARANCES:
A
Michael Aziz Zarif Shabazz
72-B-0089
Upstate Correctional Facility
P.O. Box 2001
Malone, New York 12953
Plaintiff, pro se
Attorney General of the State of New York
C. Harris Dague, Esq., Assistant New York State Attorney
The Capitol
Albany, New York 12224
Attorney for Defendants
M
Hon. Norman A. Mordue, Senior U.S. District Judge:
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
In this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of New York
State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, claims he was subjected to
excessive force and denied adequate medical care. All claims against the following defendants
have previously been dismissed: Dabiew; Velie; D. Dumas; Lacy; Candi Atkinson; Rock; Lucien
J. LeClaire; Richard Roy; John Doe; Brian Fischer; and Richard “Roe.” The remaining
defendants move (Dkt. No. 90) for partial summary judgment. Upon referral pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.3(c), United States Magistrate Judge Thérèse Wiley
Dancks issued an Order and Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 96) recommending that the
Court grant partial summary judgment dismissing all claims against the remaining defendants in
their official capacities; all claims against defendant Dr. Douyon de Azevedo; and all claims
N
against Jerry “Roe.” No objections have been filed. When a party fails to make specific
objections, the court reviews the magistrate judge's report for clear error. Pittman v. Low, 2017
WL 2189576, at *2 (N.D.N.Y. May 18, 2017). The Court has reviewed the Report and
Recommendation and finds no error.
It is therefore
A
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 96) is accepted in its entirety;
and it is further
ORDERED that defendants’ motion (Dkt. No. 90) for partial summary judgment is
granted; and it is further
ORDERED that any and all claims against the remaining defendants in their official
capacities are dismissed with prejudice; and it is further
M
ORDERED that all claims against defendant Douyon de Azevedo (sued as Mario
D'Acevedo) are dismissed with prejudice; and it is further
ORDERED that all claims against Jerry “Roe” are dismissed without prejudice; and it is
further
ORDERED that the case will proceed solely on the Eighth Amendment excessive force
-2-
claims against defendants T. Howard; R. Rhondo; and B. Burdett in their individual capacities;
and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to correct the docket to indicate that
John Doe was terminated as a defendant on March 18, 2014 (Dkt. No. 11); and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this Memorandum-Decision
and Order in accordance with the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York.
N
IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 1, 2017
Syracuse, New York
A
M
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?