Terry v. Campbell et al
Filing
43
DECISION and ORDER: ORDERED that 42 Report and Recommendation is adopted. ORDERED that 35 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and the complaint is dismissed. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 8/21/14. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------HENRY TERRY,
Plaintiff,
9:12-CV-1544
(TJM/TWD)
v.
BEVERLY CAMPBELL; PATRICIA SCHWARTZ;
COSINO FERRARI, M.D.; VONDA JOHNSON M.D.,
Defendants.
-------------------------------THOMAS J. McAVOY
Senior United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
I.
INTRODUCTION
This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon.
Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and
Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule N.D.N.Y. 72.3(c). In her
June 19, 2014 Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No. 42), Magistrate Judge
Dancks recommends that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 35) be
granted. No objections to the Report-Recommendation and Order have been filed, and
the time to do so has expired.
II.
DISCUSSION
After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-
Recommendation and Order is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.
III.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report-Recommendation and Order for the
reasons stated therein. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 35) is
GRANTED, and the Complaint is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:August 21, 2014
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?