Quick v. Graham et al

Filing 144

***VACATED***DECISION AND ORDER: The 135 Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). ORDERED, that Defendant's second motion for summary judgment is GRANTED (ECF No. 116 ), and the complaint is DISMISSED IN I TS ENTIRETY. The Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/7/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, ) Modified on 3/7/2016 per Text Order dkt. no. 145. (alh, ).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------DESMOND QUICK, Plaintiff, -v- 9:12-CV-1717 (DNH/ATB) HAROLD GRAHAM, Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: CHARLES W. GERENA Plaintiff, Pro se 03-B-1945 Great Meadow Correctional Facility Box 51 Comstock, NY 12821 New York State Attorney General The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 COLLEEN D. GALLIGAN, ESQ. DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Desmond Quick brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 8, 2016, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted, and the complaint be dismissed in its entirety. See ECF No. 135. No objections were filed. Based upon a de novo review of the Report-Recommendation, the ReportRecommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's second motion for summary judgment is GRANTED (ECF No. 116), and the complaint is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY; and 2. The Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 7, 2016 Utica, New York -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?