Cruz v. Grosso

Filing 125

ORDER: ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Dancks' July 6, 2015 122 Report-Recommendation and Order is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint without p rejudice pursuant to Rule 37(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as a sanction for Plaintiff's failure to submit to a deposition, see Dkt. No. 113 , is GRANTED. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant and close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 7/27/15. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _______________________________________________ HERMAN CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. 9:13-CV-30 (FJS/TWD) M. GROSSO, Defendant. _______________________________________________ APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL HERMAN CRUZ 86-C-0468 Sullivan Correctional Facility Box 116 Fallsburg, New York 12733 Plaintiff pro se OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL 615 Erie Boulevard West, Suite 102 Syracuse, New York 13204-2465 Attorneys for Defendant KEVIN M. HAYDEN, AAG SCULLIN, Senior Judge ORDER Plaintiff filed this pro se prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 37(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as a sanction for Plaintiff's failure to submit to a deposition or, alternatively, to dismiss the complaint as a sanction pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for making a sworn material misrepresentation to the Court. See Dkt. No. 113. Plaintiff did not file an official response to the motion, but he did send the Court several letters and motions. See Dkt. Nos. 116, 117, 119, 120). In a Report-Recommendation and Order dated July 6, 2015, Magistrate Judge Dancks recommended that the Court grant Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice as a sanction for his failure to submit to a deposition. See Dkt. No. 122 at 11-12. On July 15, 2015, the Court received Plaintiff's response to the July 6, 2015 recommendations. See Dkt. No. 123. Plaintiff's response consisted of a copy of Magistrate Judge Dancks' Report-Recommendation and Order with Plaintiff's hand-written note at the bottom of the first page. See id. at 1. Given the ambiguity of Plaintiff's response, the Court directed the Clerk of the Court to send Plaintiff another copy of Magistrate Judge Dancks' Report-Recommendation and Order and reminded Plaintiff that his objections, if any, were due on or before July 23, 2015. See Dkt. No. 124, Text Order. Plaintiff has not filed any additional response to Magistrate Judge Dancks' Report-Recommendation and Order. When a party does not object to a magistrate judge's report-recommendation, the court reviews that report-recommendation for clear error or manifest injustice. See Linares v. Mahunik, No. 9:05-CV-625, 2009 WL 3165660, *10 (N.D.N.Y. July 16, 2009) (citation and footnote omitted). After conducting this review, "the Court may 'accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the . . . recommendations made by the magistrate judge.'" Id. (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)). The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Dancks' July 6, 2015 Report-Recommendation and Order for clear error and manifest injustice; and, finding none, the Court hereby ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Dancks' July 6, 2015 Report-Recommendation and Order is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and the Court further -2- ORDERS that Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice pursuant to Rule 37(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as a sanction for Plaintiff's failure to submit to a deposition, see Dkt. No. 113, is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant and close this case; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 27, 2015 Syracuse, New York -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?