Barnes v. Fischer et al

Filing 195

ORDER: ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece filed September 22, 2014 (Dkt. No. 185 ) is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. ORDERED that Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 94 ) is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 10/15/14. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------JESSIE J. BARNES Plaintiff, -v.Civil Action No. 9:13-cv-164 (GLS/RFT) BRIAN FISCHER et al. Defendants. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR THE PLAINTIFF: JESSIE J. BARNES Pro Se 09-B-2707 Upstate Correctional Facility P.O. Box 2001 309 Bare Hill Road Malone, New York 12953 HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General of the State of New York The Capitol Albany, New York 12224 MELISSA A. LATINO, ESQ. Assistant Attorney General GARY L. SHARPE, CHIEF JUDGE ORDER The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation by Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece, duly filed September 22, 2014. Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece filed September 22, 2014 (Dkt. No. 185) is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and it is further ORDERED that Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 94) is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk provide a copy of this Order upon the parties in accordance with the local rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 15, 2014 Albany, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?