Chaney v. D'Agostino et al
Filing
52
DECISION AND ORDER: Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 51 ) is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). ORDERED that, Defendant D'Agos tino's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 34 ) is GRANTED and all federal claims against him are DISMISSED. ORDERED, that defendant Masiello's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 40 ) is GRANTED and all federal claims against her are DISMISSED. ORDERED, that to the extent plaintiff asserts state law claims, the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction will be declined pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) and those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. ORDERED, that the c omplaint is DISMISSED in its entirety. ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules, enter judgment accordingly, and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/5/15. (served on plaintiff by regular and certified mail) (alh, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------NAKIA CHANEY,
Plaintiff,
-v-
No. 9:13-CV-251
(DNH/ATB)
DOMINIC D'AGOSTINO, Schenectady County
Sheriff; and KATHLEEN MASIELLO, Inmate
Records Coordinator, Wallkill Correctional
Facility,
Defendants.
-------------------------------APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
NAKIA CHANEY
Plaintiff Pro Se
1326 Fulton Avenue
Apt. #5B
Bronx, NY 10456
GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP
Attorneys for Defendant D'Agostino
8 Southwoods Boulevard
Suite 300
Albany, NY 12211
JONATHAN M. BERNSTEIN, ESQ.
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General for the State of New York
Attorney for Defendant Masiello
615 Erie Boulevard West
Suite 102
Syracuse, NY 13204
KEVIN M. HAYDEN, ESQ.
Ass't Attorney General
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Pro se plaintiff Nakia Chaney filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On February 10, 2015, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge,
advised by Report-Recommendation that both defendant D'Agostino and defendant
Masiello's motions for summary judgment be granted on the basis of qualified immunity and
the complaint be dismissed in its entirety. No objections to the Report-Recommendation
were filed.
Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the
Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1).
Therefore, it is
ORDERED that
1. Defendant D'Agostino's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and all
federal claims against him are DISMISSED;
2. Defendant Masiello's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and all federal
claims against her are DISMISSED;
3. To the extent plaintiff asserts state law claims, the exercise of supplemental
jurisdiction will be declined pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) and those claim s are
DISMISSED without prejudice;
4. The complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety; and
5. The Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance
with the Local Rules, enter judgment accordingly, and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
-2-
Dated: March 5, 2015
Utica, New York.
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?