Faill v. Buehler et al

Filing 24

DECISION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, dkt. # 23 . The action is DISMISSED and Defendants' motion for summary judgment, dkt. # 18 , is DENIED as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/26/15. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSEPH FAILL, Plaintiff, v. 9:13-CV-557 CAPT. ADAMIK, SUPERINTENDENT BRANDON J. SMITH, Defendants. THOMAS J. McAVOY Senior United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER This action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and alleging violations of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights in a prison disciplinary hearing, was referred by this Court to the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). In the Report-Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Dancks recommends that the case be dismissed and Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be denied as moot because Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has not informed the Court of a change in address and has apparently abandoned the case. No objections to the Re port-Recommendation dated March 4, 2015 have been filed. After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report-Recommendation for the 1 reasons stated therein. For the foregoing reasons, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, dkt. # 23. The action is DISMISSED and Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, dkt. # 18, is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 26, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?