Deliser v. Miller et al

Filing 54

DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Peebles' Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 53 ) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 46 ) is GRANTED. ORDERED that Plainti ff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED in its entirety and the Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment for Defendant and close this action. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 11/25/15. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _____________________________________________ JOSUE DELISER, Plaintiff, 9:13-CV-803 (GTS/DEP) v. J. MILLER, Lt. C.O., Defendant. _____________________________________________ APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: JOSUE DELISER, 09-A-3970 Plaintiff, Pro Se Clinton Correctional Facility P.O. Box 2001 Dannemora, New York 12929 HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York Counsel for Defendant The Capitol Albany, New York 12224 MELISSA A. LATINO, ESQ. Assistant Attorney General GLENN T. SUDDABY, Chief United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Currently before the Court, in this pro se prisoner civil rights action filed by Josue Deliser (“Plaintiff”) against New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision employee J. Miller (“Defendant”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, are (1) Defendant’s motion to dismiss, and (2) United States Magistrate Judge Peebles’ Report-Recommendation recommending that Defendants' motion be granted. (Dkt. Nos. 46, 53.) None of the parties have filed objections to the Report-Recommendation, and the deadline by which to do so has expired. (See generally Docket Sheet.) After carefully reviewing the relevant papers herein, including Magistrate Judge Peebles’ thorough Report-Recommendation, the Court can find no clear error in the Report-Recommendation.1 Magistrate Judge Peebles employed the proper standards, accurately recited the facts, and reasonably applied the law to those facts. As a result, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in its entirety for the reasons set forth therein, and Defendant’s motion is granted. ACCORDINGLY, it is ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Peebles’ Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 53) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 46) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED in its entirety and the Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment for Defendant and close this action. Dated: November 25, 2015 Syracuse, New York ____________________________________ Hon. Glenn T. Suddaby Chief, United States District Judge 1 When no objection is made to a report-recommendation, the Court subjects that reportrecommendation to only a clear-error review. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes: 1983 Addition. When performing such a clear-error review, “the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Id.; see also Batista v. Walker, 94-CV-2826, 1995 WL 453299, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 31, 1995) (Sotomayor, J.) (“I am permitted to adopt those sections of [a magistrate judge’s] report to which no specific objection is made, so long as those sections are not facially erroneous.”) (internal quotation marks omitted). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?