Burgos v. Bly
Filing
3
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that this action is DISMISSED. That no Certificate of Appealability ("COA") shall issue because petitioner has failed to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" as 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2), in accordance with the Decision and Order issued by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on April 14, 2014. (ptm) (Copy served on petitioner by regular mail)
================================================================================
*****
NORTHERN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT * * * * *
NEW YORK
DISTRICT OF
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
DOCKET NO. 9:14-cv-385 (GLS/RFT)
TOMAS BURGOS
v.
EDWARD BLY
JURY VERDICT. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried
and the jury has rendered its verdict.
X
DECISION BY COURT. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues
have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that this action is DISMISSED. That no Certificate of Appealability (“COA”)
shall issue because petitioner has failed to make a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right” as 28
U.S.C. §2253(c)(2), in accordance with the Decision and Order issued by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on April 14, 2014.
April 14, 2014
LAWRENCE K. BAERMAN
CLERK OF THE COURT
BY:
S/
DEPUTY CLERK
John Law
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?