Ferrer v. Racette et al

Filing 89

ORDER: As part of the Court's discovery conference held on June 8, 2016, counsel for the Defendants were instructed to provide to chambers the personnel files for their clients at the earliest possible date. Dkt. No. 68. On July 24, 2016, the personnel file for Defendant Daniel McClenning was reviewed by the Court. The in camera review of Defendant McClenning's personnel file reflected one set of documents that may possibly be used for impeachment purposes, or as part of the supervi sory claim. When retrieving the personnel file, Defendant's Counsel Jeffrey Mans shall make a copy of the thirteen total pages from the personnel file which have been tagged and paper clipped together by the Court. Counsel shall redact any infor mation regarding the Defendant's date of birth, home address, and social security number. The redacted copies shall be provided to the Plaintiff's counsel, with copies to the counsel for the remaining Defendants. Because of the nature and c ircumstances of the case, and the specific needs of the correctional facility, the Plaintiff's counsel is directed not to provide copies of the disclosed portions of the personnel file to the Plaintiff. However, counsel is not barred from discus sing the content of the documents with her client. The Court directs that the Defendant's Counsel immediately retrieve from the Court's courtroom deputy, Maria Blunt, the McClenning personnel file. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 7/24/16. (alh, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RODNEY FERRER, Plaintiff, -v- Civ. No. 9:14-CV-1370 (GTS/DJS) STEVEN RACETTE, et al., Defendants. APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: OFFICE OF JESSICA M. GORMAN Attorney for Plaintiff 74 Chapel Street, 2d Floor Albany, NY 12207 JESSICA M. GORMAN, ESQ. HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General of the State of New York Attorney for Defendants Racette, Kelly, Goodman, Waite, and Jenkins The Capitol Albany, New York 12224 CATHY Y. SHEEHAN, ESQ. Assistant Attorney General LAMARCHE, SAFRANKO LAW FIRM Attorney for Defendant Fraizer 1539 Crescent Road P.O. Box 5437 Clifton Park, NY 12065 ANDREW R. SAFRANKO, ESQ. HARRIS, CONWAY LAW FIRM Attorney for Defendant Livermore The Patroon Building 5 Clinton Square Albany, NY 12207 RYAN T. DONOVAN, ESQ. LIPPES MATHIAS WEXLER FRIEDMAN LLP Attorney for Defendants and Counter Claimants Beecher, Burch, and McClenning 54 State Street, Suite 1001 Albany, NY 12207 JEFFREY P. MANS, ESQ. DANIEL J. STEWART UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ORDER As part of the Court’s discovery conference held on June 8, 2016, counsel for the Defendants were instructed to provide to chambers the personnel files for their clients at the earliest possible date. Dkt. No. 68. On July 24, 2016, the personnel file for Defendant Daniel McClenning was reviewed by the Court. The in camera review of Defendant McClenning’s personnel file reflected one set of documents that may possibly be used for impeachment purposes, or as part of the supervisory claim. When retrieving the personnel file, Defendant’s Counsel Jeffrey Mans shall make a copy of the thirteen total pages from the personnel file which have been tagged and paper clipped together by the Court. Counsel shall redact any information regarding the Defendant’s date of birth, home address, and social security number. The redacted copies shall be provided to the Plaintiff’s counsel, with copies to the counsel for the remaining Defendants. Because of the nature and circumstances of the case, and the specific needs of the correctional facility, the Plaintiff’s counsel is directed not to provide copies of the disclosed portions of the personnel file to the Plaintiff. However, counsel is not barred from discussing the content of the documents with her client. The Court directs that the Defendant’s Counsel immediately retrieve from the Court’s courtroom deputy, Maria Blunt, the McClenning personnel file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: July 24, 2016 Albany, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?