Gomez et al v. Tedford et al
Filing
84
DECISION and ORDER: ORDERED that the Court ACCEPTS the Report-Recommendation and Order [dkt. # 83 ] for the reasons stated therein. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [dkt. # 69 ] is GRANTED and the action is DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/12/18. {order served via regular and certified mail on plaintiff}(nas, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
________________________________________
SANTIAGO GOMEZ,
Plaintiff,
-v-
Civ. No. 9:14-CV-1476
(TJM/DJS)
D. PERRYMAN and PAUL WOODRUFF,
Defendants.
________________________________________
THOMAS J. McAVOY,
Senior United States District Judge
DECISION & ORDER
I.
INTRODUCTION
This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon.
Daniel J. Stewart, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to Magistrate Judge
Stewart’s February 16, 2018 Report-Recommendation and Order [dkt. # 83] have been
filed, and the time to do so has expired.
II.
DISCUSSION
After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-
Recommendation and Order is not subject to attack f or plain error or manifest injustice.
III.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS the Report-Recommendation and Order [dkt. # 83]
1
for the reasons stated therein. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [dkt. # 69] is
GRANTED and the action is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 12, 2018
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?