Abreu v. Kooi et al

Filing 87

ORDER: ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No. 85 ) is ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED that this case is administratively closed until such time as proof of full payment of the monetary sanction ($146.71) imposed on plaintiff by Judge Stewart is provided to the court. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 10/13/17. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________ CARLOS ABREU, Plaintiff, 9:14-cv-1529 (GLS/DJS) v. DR. KOOI, Auburn Correctional Facility et al., Defendants. ________________________________ APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR PLAINTIFF: CARLOS ABREU Plaintiff, pro se 99-A-3027 Five Points Correctional Facility Caller Box 119 Romulus, New York 14541 FOR DEFENDANTS: HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN New York State Attorney General The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 Gary L. Sharpe Senior District Judge AIMEE M. PAQUETTE Assistant Attorney General ORDER The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation and Order by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart, duly filed on September 12, 2017. (Dkt. No. 85.) Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Report-Recommendation and Order for clear error, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No. 85) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that this case is administratively closed until such time as proof of full payment of the monetary sanction ($146.71) imposed on plaintiff by Judge Stewart is provided to the court; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk provide a copy of this Order to the parties in accordance with the local rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 October 13, 2017 Albany, New York 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?