Abreu v. Kooi et al
Filing
87
ORDER: ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No. 85 ) is ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED that this case is administratively closed until such time as proof of full payment of the monetary sanction ($146.71) imposed on plaintiff by Judge Stewart is provided to the court. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 10/13/17. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
________________________________
CARLOS ABREU,
Plaintiff,
9:14-cv-1529
(GLS/DJS)
v.
DR. KOOI, Auburn Correctional
Facility et al.,
Defendants.
________________________________
APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
FOR PLAINTIFF:
CARLOS ABREU
Plaintiff, pro se
99-A-3027
Five Points Correctional Facility
Caller Box 119
Romulus, New York 14541
FOR DEFENDANTS:
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
New York State Attorney General
The Capitol
Albany, NY 12224
Gary L. Sharpe
Senior District Judge
AIMEE M. PAQUETTE
Assistant Attorney General
ORDER
The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation and Order by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart, duly
filed on September 12, 2017. (Dkt. No. 85.) Following fourteen days from
the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all
objections filed by the parties herein.
No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the
Report-Recommendation and Order for clear error, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No.
85) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further
ORDERED that this case is administratively closed until such time as
proof of full payment of the monetary sanction ($146.71) imposed on
plaintiff by Judge Stewart is provided to the court; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk provide a copy of this Order to the parties
in accordance with the local rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
October 13, 2017
Albany, New York
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?