Coleman v. Racette et al

Filing 38

DECISION AND ORDER: The 34 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter is ADOPTED. ORDERED, that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, dkt. # 28 , is hereby GRANTED. ORDERED, that the complaint against Defendant Racette is dismissed in its entirety. ORDERED, that plaintiff's retaliation claims are dismissed against Defendant Nolan. ORDERED, that the case proceed to discovery as against defendant Nolan for plaintiff's excessive force claim only. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 1/4/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TOWAUN COLEMAN, Plaintiff, -vs- 9:15-CV-40 (TJM/ATB) STEVEN RACETTE, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, and L. NOLAN, Prison Guard Defendants. Thomas J. McAvoy, United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER This matter was referred to the Hon. Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 72.3(d) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York. No objections to the December 7, 2015 Report-Recommendation have been raised. Plaintiff has instead provided the Court with a copy of his discovery requests. See dkt. # 35. After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, this Court adopts the ReportRecommendation and Order for the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter is hereby ADOPTED, and: 1. The Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, dkt. # 28, is hereby GRANTED; 2. The Complaint against Defendant Racette is dismissed in its entirety; 1 3. Plaintiff’s retaliation claims are dismissed against Defendant Nolan; and 4. It is hereby ORDERED that the case proceed to discovery as against Defendant Nolan for Plaintiff’s excessive force claim only. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 4, 2016 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?