Celestin v. Rock et al

Filing 42

DECISION AND ORDER: Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the 40 Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that: (1) Defendants ' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (ECF No. 35 ) is GRANTED; (2) The Complaint is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY; (3) The Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/22/17. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------CLIVENS CELESTIN, Plaintiff, -v- 9:15-CV-0541 (DNH/ATB) DAVID ROCK, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility; PATERSON, Correction Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility; A. FORBES, Correction Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility; KROEGER, Correction Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility, DEMERS, Correction Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility; D. HAUG, Food Service Administrator; Upstate Correctional Facility; SGT. DEBYA, Upstate Correctional Facility; Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: CLIVENS CELESTIN Plaintiff, Pro Se 94-A-5376 Shawangunk Correctional Facility P.O. Box 700 Wallkill, New York 12589 HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York Attorneys for Defendants The Capitol Albany, New York 12224 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge TIMOTHY P. MULVEY, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Clivens Celestin brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Complaint, ECF No. 1. On July 20, 2016, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (ECF No. 35) be granted. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that: (1) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (ECF No. 35) is GRANTED; (2) The Complaint is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY; (3) The Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the case IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 22, 2017 Utica, New York -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?