Barnes v. Annucci et al

Filing 60

ORDER: ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 56 ) isADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED that defendants' motion to revoke plaintiff's IFP status and conditionally dismiss the complaint in this matter, (Dkt. No. 30 ), is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 9/7/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________ ARRELLO BARNES Plaintiff, 9:15-cv-777 (GLS/DEP) v. ANTHONY ANNUCCI, Acting Commissioner et al. Defendants. ________________________________ APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR THE PLAINTIFF: ARRELLO BARNES 00-A-0957 Southport Correctional Facility P.O. Box 2000 Pine City, New York 14871 FOR THE DEFENDANTS: HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN New York State Attorney General The Capitol Albany, New York 12224 COLLEEN D. GALLIGAN Assistant Attorney General Gary L. Sharpe Senior District Judge ORDER The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles, duly filed on August 10, 2016. (Dkt. No. 56.) Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. No objections having been filed1, and the court having reviewed the Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 56) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s IFP status and conditionally dismiss the complaint in this matter, (Dkt. No. 30), is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the clerk of the court serve a copy of this order upon the parties in accordance with this court’s Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. September 7, 2016 Albany, New York 1 On August 29, 2016, plaintiff filed a letter advising the court that he does not have any objections to the Report-Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 59.) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?