Fann v. Graham et al
Filing
99
ORDER: ORDERED that plaintiff's demand for the personnel file of defendant Steinberg is DENIED, as nothing contained within that file is the proper subject of discovery pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 10/5/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JERMAINE FANN,
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 15-CV-1339
(DNH/CFH)
H. GRAHAM, Superintendent, Auburn
Correctional Facility; et al.,
Defendants.
CHRISTIAN F. HUMMEL
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
Jermaine Fann
Plaintiff pro se
430 Main Street, Apt. 206
Dunkirk, New York 14048
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General for the
State of New York
The Capitol
Albany, New York 12224-0341
Attorney for Defendants
WILLIAM A. SCOTT, ESQ.
Assistant Attorney General
NICOLE E. HAIMSON, ESQ.
Assistant Attorney General
ORDER
On August 16, 2016, this Court issued an order directing that the personnel file of
defendant Gary Steinberg be produced for an in camera review. Dkt. No. 87. On
September 29, 2016, defendants produced the personnel file of defendant Steinberg for an
in camera review. Dkt. No. 98. Based on the Court’s in camera review of that file, it is
hereby
ORDERED that plaintiff’s demand for the personnel file of defendant Steinberg is
DENIED, as nothing contained within that file is the proper subject of discovery pursuant to
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court serve copies of this Order on the parties in
accordance with the Local Rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 5, 2016
Albany, New York
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?