Smith v. Annucci et al

Filing 24

ORDER: ORDERS that 23 Magistrate Judge Baxter's November 28, 2016 Report-Recommendation is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. ORDERS that Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim, see Dkt. No. 18 , is GRANTED. ORDERS that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a proper motion to amend his complaint, together with a proposed amended complaint consistent with Magistrate Judge Baxter's November 28, 2016 Report-Recommendation within forty-five (45) days of the filing date of this Order.Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 12/20/16. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _________________________________________________ RYAN A. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. 9:16-CV-602 (FJS/ATB) ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, Acting Commissioner of Corrections; MICHAEL VELEZ, Grievance Commissioner; and MICHAEL SHEAHAM, Superintendent, Southport Correctional Facility, Defendants. _________________________________________________ APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL RYAN A. SMITH 14-A-0536 Downstate Correctional Facility Box F Fishkill, New York 12524 Plaintiff pro se OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL The Capitol Albany, New York 12224 Attorneys for Defendants CHRISTOPHER J. HUMMEL, AAG SCULLIN, Senior Judge ORDER On November 28, 2016, Magistrate Judge Baxter issued a Report-Recommendation, in which he recommended that this Court grant Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and dismiss the complaint without prejudice "to [P]laintiff filing a proper motion to amend, together with a proposed amended complaint [consistent with the Report-Recommendation] within forty-five (45) days of the date of the [O]rder approving [his] Report-Recommendation." See Dkt. No. 23 at 14. The parties did not file any objections to the Report-Recommendation within the required time frame. When a party does not object to a magistrate judge's report-recommendation, the court reviews that report-recommendation for clear error or manifest injustice. See Linares v. Mahunik, No. 9:05-CV-625, 2009 WL 3165660, *10 (N.D.N.Y. July 16, 2009) (citation and footnote omitted). After conducting its review, "the Court may 'accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the . . . recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. (quoting 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(C)). The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Baxter's November 28, 2016 ReportRecommendation for clear error and manifest injustice; and, finding none, the Court hereby ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Baxter's November 28, 2016 Report-Recommendation is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim, see Dkt. No. 18, is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a proper motion to amend his complaint, together with a proposed amended complaint consistent with Magistrate Judge Baxter's November 28, 2016 Report-Recommendation within forty-five (45) days of the filing date of this Order; and the Court further -2- ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 20, 2016 Syracuse, New York -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?