Burks v. Stickney et al

Filing 57

ORDER: ORDERED that, (1) On or before July 1, 2017, defendants shall produce to plaintiff a list of all known investigations conducted of DOCCS employees at the Clinton Correctional Facility and in progress at any time between January 1, 2015 and A ugust 31, 2015, related to the issue of smuggling and/or secreting of contraband, or prisoner abuse, at the facility. Such list shall include the dates on which the investigation began and ended, state the subject of the investigation, and identi fy any DOCCS employees whose actions were investigated. (2) On or before July 1, 2017, the defendants shall advise plaintiff of the dates over which the investigation into the actions of defendant Chad Stickney, referred to in paragraph twelve of the declaration of Sean Mousseau (Dkt. No. 53-1), was conducted. (3) The foregoing requirements, and specifically the July 1, 2017 compliance date, shall be automatically stayed in the event of an appeal of this ruling to Senior District Judg e Frederick J. Scullin. (4) With the exception of the foregoing, plaintiff's motion to compel discovery (Dkt. No. 51 ) is DENIED. (5) No costs or attorney's fees are awarded to any party in connection with plaintiff's motion to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 6/14/17. (alh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MATTIEU BURKS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 9:16-CV-0759 (FJS/DEP) v. CHAD STICKNEY, et al., Defendants. APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR PLAINTIFF: STOLL, GLICKMAN & BELLINA LLP 475 Atlantic Avenue, Third Floor Brooklyn, New York 11217 LEO GLICKMAN, ESQ. FOR DEFENDANTS: HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN New York State Attorney General The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 DENISE P. BUCKLEY, ESQ. Assistant Attorney General DAVID E. PEEBLES CHIEF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ORDER Currently pending before the court in connection with this matter is a motion brought by plaintiff Mattieu Burks to compel discovery. Dkt. No. 51. The subject of the motion are two requests demanding documents concerning investigations of individuals employed by the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision ("DOCCS") and working at the Clinton Correctional Facility concerning the smuggling and/or secreting of contraband and prisoner abuse. Id. Defendants oppose plaintiff's motion. Dkt. No. 53. Oral argument was heard in connection with plaintiff's motion during a recorded telephone conference held on June 13, 2017. At the close of the conference I denied plaintiff's motion but ordered the production of certain information deemed by the court to be relevant to plaintiff's claims. Based upon the oral and written presentations of the parties and the court's bench decision, which is incorporated herein by reference, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) On or before July 1, 2017, defendants shall produce to plaintiff a list of all known investigations conducted of DOCCS employees at the Clinton Correctional Facility and in progress at any time between January 1, 2015 and August 31, 2015, related to the issue of smuggling and/or secreting of contraband, or prisoner abuse, at the facility. Such list shall include the dates on which the investigation began and ended, state the subject of the investigation, and identify any DOCCS employees whose actions were investigated. 2 (2) On or before July 1, 2017, the defendants shall advise plaintiff of the dates over which the investigation into the actions of defendant Chad Stickney, referred to in paragraph twelve of the declaration of Sean Mousseau (Dkt. No. 53-1), was conducted. (3) The foregoing requirements, and specifically the July 1, 2017 compliance date, shall be automatically stayed in the event of an appeal of this ruling to Senior District Judge Frederick J. Scullin. (4) With the exception of the foregoing, plaintiff's motion to compel discovery (Dkt. No. 51) is DENIED. (5) No costs or attorney's fees are awarded to any party in connection with plaintiff's motion to compel. Dated: June 14, 2017 Syracuse, New York 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?