Stephanski v. Artus et al
Filing
30
DECISION AND ORDER: Based upon a de novo review of the 29 Report-Recommendation, the Report- Recommendation is accepted in whole. ORDERED that 1. Defendants' 25 motion to dismiss is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff's 27 motion to amend is DENIED; 3. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety; and 4. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 9/21/17. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------PAUL STEPHANSKI,
Plaintiff,
-v-
9:16-CV-1155
(DNH/DJS)
DALE ARTUS, Superintendent, Clinton
Correctional Facility; CAPT. STEVEN
RACETTE, Dept of Security, Clinton
Correctional Facility; STEPHEN LACY,
Captain, Clinton Correctional Facility; and
RAYMOND FURNIA, Sargent, Clinton
Correctional Facility,
Defendants.
-------------------------------APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
PAUL STEPHANSKI
Plaintiff pro se
99-B-2439
Mid-State Correctional Facility
P.O. Box 2500
Marcy, NY 13403
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General for the State of New York
Attorney for Defendants
The Capitol
Albany, NY 12224
COLLEEN D. GALLIGAN, ESQ.
Ass't Attorney General
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Pro se plaintiff Paul Stephanski brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983. On August 11, 2017, the Honorable Daniel J. Stewart, United States Magistrate
Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendants' motion to dismiss be granted,
plaintiff's motion to amend be denied, and that the complaint be dismissed in its entirety. No
objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.
Based upon a de novo review of the Report-Recommendation, the ReportRecommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Therefore, it is
ORDERED that
1. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED;
2. Plaintiff's motion to amend is DENIED;
3. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety; and
4. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 21, 2017
Utica, New York.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?