Fredericks v. Borden et al
Filing
78
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the 71 Report- Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). ORDERED that Defendants' [ 47] motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to the claim against defendant R. Oliveira is GRANTED and the Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED as against him. ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to the claim against defendant B. Borden is DENIED. ORDERED that trial on plaintiff's remaining Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendant B. Borden is scheduled for February 10, 2020 in Utica, New York. ORDERED that Plaintiff is directed to contact the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this Decision and Order with any request for the appointment of pro bono counsel. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 9/30/19. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------NIGEL FREDERICKS,
Plaintiff,
-v-
9:17-CV-15
(DNH/DJS)
B. BORDEN, Correction Officer, Franklin
Correctional Facility and R. OLIVEIRA,
Defendants.
-------------------------------APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
NIGEL FREDERICKS
Plaintiff pro se
1411904251
George R. Vierno Center
09-09 Hazen Street
East Elmhurst, NY 11370
HON. LETITIA JAMES
Attorney General for the State of New York
Attorney for Defendants
The Capitol
Albany, NY 12224
HELENA O. PEDERSON, ESQ.
ADRIENNE J. KERWIN, ESQ.
Ass't Attorneys General
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Pro se plaintiff Nigel Fredericks brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983. On August 6, 2019, the Honorable Daniel J. Stewart, United States Magistrate
Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendants' unopposed 1 motion for
summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part. No objections to the ReportRecommendation have been filed.
Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the
Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1).
Therefore, it is
ORDERED that
1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in
part;
2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to the claim against defendant R.
Oliveira is GRANTED and the Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED as against him;
3. Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to the claim against defendant B.
Borden is DENIED;
4. Trial on plaintiff's remaining Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against
defendant B. Borden is scheduled for February 10, 2020 in Utica, New York; and
5. Plaintiff is directed to contact the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this
Decision and Order with any request for the appointment of pro bono counsel.
1
Despite numerous extensions of time granted sua sponte by the Court, plaintiff has not filed
any opposition to the motion.
-2-
Dated: September 30, 2019
Utica, New York.
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?