Resto-Otero v. Doe et al

Filing 27

ORDER: ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 26 ) is ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 21 ) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 11/5/18. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL RESTO-OTERO, Plaintiff, 9:17-cv-1115 (GLS/DEP) v. IMAM MOHAMMAD, Defendant. APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR PLAINTIFF MICHAEL RESTO-OTERO Plaintiff Pro Se 10-B-1849 Auburn Correctional Facility P.O. Box 618 Auburn, NY 13021 FOR DEFENDANTS: HON. BARBARA D. UNDERWOOD New York Attorney General The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 DAVID A. ROSENBERG Assistant Attorney General Gary L. Sharpe Senior District Judge ORDER The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles duly filed on October 3, 2018. (Dkt. No. 26.) Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 26) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that defendant’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 21) is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk provide a copy of this Order to the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. November 5, 2018 Albany, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?