Milburn v. Dogin et al
Filing
638
ORDER re: 625 Letter filed by Louis Milburn. Before the Court is Class Counsel's motion to substitute representative plaintiffs in this matter. (See dkt. no. 625.) Defendants indicate that they are "willing to conditionally consent to the substitution at this time if the Court allows Defendants to reserve any objections they may have concerning the adequacy of the new class representatives upon receipt and review of the relevant records." (Dkt. no. 635 at 1.) Class counsel has no objection to that proposal. (See dkt. no. 637.) Accordingly, the motion to substitute the proposed class representatives [dkt. no. 625] is GRANTED, subject to Defendants' right to reserve objections to the representatives. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 8/2/2021) (va)
Case 1:79-cv-05077-LAP Document 638 Filed 08/02/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LOUIS MILBURN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
No. 79-CV-5077 (LAP)
-against-
ORDER
HENRY S. DOGIN, et al.,
Defendants.
LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge:
Before the Court is Class Counsel’s motion to substitute
representative plaintiffs in this matter.
(See dkt. no. 625.)
Defendants indicate that they are “willing to conditionally
consent to the substitution at this time if the Court allows
Defendants to reserve any objections they may have concerning
the adequacy of the new class representatives upon receipt and
review of the relevant records.”
(Dkt. no. 635 at 1.)
counsel has no objection to that proposal.
Class
(See dkt. no. 637.)
Accordingly, the motion to substitute the proposed class
representatives [dkt. no. 625] is GRANTED, subject to
Defendants’ right to reserve objections to the representatives.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 2, 2021
New York, New York
__________________________________
LORETTA A. PRESKA
Senior United States District Judge
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?