Milburn v. Dogin et al

Filing 831

ORDER: granting 802 Motion re: 802 CONSENT MOTION Preliminarily Approve Modified Consent Order and Related Relief. At the Fairness Hearing held on January 31, 2024, the parties jointly moved to convert the Order Preliminarily Approving the Mod ified Consent Order, (see dkt. no. 813), to a permanently approved Modified Consent Order. After reviewing the proposed Modified Consent Order, (see dkt. no. 810-1), and reading and hearing the objections to the proposed Modified Consent Order that c ertain class members made in writing and at the Fairness Hearing, the Court finds that the proposed Modified Consent Order is fair, reasonable, and adequate. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(2). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the parties' joint motion and hereby permanently approves the Modified Consent Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 2/01/2024) (ama)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PABLO BERIQUETE, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 79-CV-5077 (LAP) -against- ORDER DANIEL F. MARTUCELLO III, et al., Defendants. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: At the Fairness Hearing held on January 31, 2024, the parties jointly moved to convert the Order Preliminarily Approving the Modified Consent Order, (see dkt. no. 813), to a permanently approved Modified Consent Order. After reviewing the proposed Modified Consent Order, (see dkt. no. 810-1), and reading and hearing the objections to the proposed Modified Consent Order that certain class members made in writing and at the Fairness Hearing, the Court finds that the proposed Modified Consent Order is fair, reasonable, and adequate. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(2). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the parties’ joint motion and hereby permanently approves the Modified Consent Order. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 1, 2024 New York, New York __________________________________ LORETTA A. PRESKA Senior United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?