Gulino, et al v. Board of Education, et al
Filing
3929
JUDGMENT FOR JANNET FRANCO: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Jannet Franco will have judgment against the BOE as follows: 1. LAST Fees in the amount of $158; and 2. Pre-judgment interest calculated to be $43; IT IS FURTHE R ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Court adopts the Special Master's recommendation that this judgment be certified as final and appealable pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) and expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay for the reasons stated in the Special Master's Report and Recommendation. This Judgment Entry is certified and entered by the Court pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 12/18/2019) (jca)
Case 1:96-cv-08414-KMW Document 3211-12 Filed 11/19/19 Page 26 of 96
USDCSDNY
DOCUMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
X
ELSA GULINO, MA YLING RALPH, PETER WILDS,
and NIA GREENE, on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,
DATE F1_L_E_D_:- ,-o\
-
} ;;l - - -5
~ -!7" Ji,
96 Civ. 8414 (KMW)
Plaintiffs,
[PR~ ~
JUDGMENT
FOR
JANNET FRANCO
- against THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK,
Defendant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
X
WHEREAS, the Court certified a remedy-phase class of Plaintiffs (See Gulino v. Bd. of Educ. of
the City Sch. Dist. of the City of NY, Opinion and Order, No. 96-cv-8414, [ECF No, 386]), and
Jannet Franco ("Claimant") is a member of that class;
WHEREAS, the Court appointed a Special Master (See May 20, 2014 Order of Appointment,
[ECF No, 435]; November 12, 2014 Second Amended Order of Appointment, [ECF No, 524]) to
hear, among other things, demands for damages;
WHEREAS, the Special Master made, and the Court adopted, Classwide Conclusions of Law,
[ECF Nos. 999, 1008]);
WHEREAS, the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York
("BOE") and Plaintiffs entered into, and the Court so ordered, a Stipulation of Classwide Facts &
Procedures, [ECF No, 1009];
WHEREAS, the BOE and Plaintiffs entered into, and the Court so ordered, a Supplemental
Stipulation Concerning Admissibility of Exhibits, which attached a Supplemental Index of
Exhibits (collectively referred to as the "Classwide Exhibits") filed with the Court, [ECF No,
1.8..3.1];
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and the BOE executed a Stipulation Regarding Expedited Class Members
dated October 2, 2019, and have prepared the annexed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
for Jannet Franco, which the Special Master recommends that the Court adopt;
WHEREAS, the Special Master recommended, and the parties agreed with the Special Master's
recommendation, that the Court certify this judgment as final and appealable pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b);
1
Case 1:96-cv-08414-KMW Document 3211-12 Filed 11/19/19 Page 27 of 96
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the annexed Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law for Jannet Franco (Exhibit 1) is adopted;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Jannet Franco will have
judgment against the BOE as follows:
1. LAST Fees in the amount of $158; and
2. Pre-judgment interest calculated to be $43;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Court adopts the Special
Master's recommendation that this judgment be certified as final and appealable pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) and expressly determines that there is no just reason for
delay for the reasons stated in the Special Master's Report and Recommendation.
This Judgment Entry is certified and entered by the Court pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure.
Dated:
l?/l'SJ/'1
ENTERED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?