Gulino, et al v. Board of Education, et al

Filing 7018

ORDER: As set forth in the Second Amended Order of Appointment and consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 53(f), the Court reviews de novo all objections to conclusions of law and findings of fact made or recommended by the Special Mas ter. (ECF No. 524.) Upon de novo review of the R&R, as well as the Findings of Fact and the Conclusions Lawand after reviewing the previous Interim R&Rs that this Court has already adoptedthe Court adopts the Findings of Fact and Conclusions o f Law for the Fourth Cohort of Expedited Class Members; will enter the Proposed Judgments for the Fourth Cohort of Expedited Class Members; expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay; and certifies the Proposed Judgments for the Fourth Cohort of Expedited Class Members as final and appealable pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 1/11/2021) (va)

Download PDF
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: __________________ DATE FILED: January 11, 2021 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------X GULINO, ET AL., Plaintiffs, -against- 96-CV-8414 (KMW) ORDER THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant. ----------------------------------------------------X KIMBA M. WOOD, United States District Judge: On May 20, 2014, this case was referred to Special Master John Siffert pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 53(a)(1)(B) and this Court’s inherent equitable powers and authority. (ECF Nos. 435, 524.) On December 31, 2020, Special Master Siffert filed a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that this Court adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the fourth cohort of class members whose damages were determined using the Expedited Damages Model, identified in the Appendix to Exhibit 1 of the R&R (“Fourth Cohort of Expedited Class Members”); enter the Proposed Judgments submitted with the R&R as Exhibits 3-8; and certify those Proposed Judgments as final and appealable pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). (ECF No. 7016.) The parties agree that objections that have been preserved in the record do not need to be resubmitted to the Court in connection with this R&R. The parties further agree that the Court may adopt or reject the R&R on the basis of the arguments and objections to rulings contained in the record. As set forth in the Second Amended Order of Appointment and consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 53(f), the Court reviews de novo all objections to conclusions of law and 1 findings of fact made or recommended by the Special Master. (ECF No. 524.) Upon de novo review of the R&R, as well as the Findings of Fact and the Conclusions Law—and after reviewing the previous Interim R&Rs that this Court has already adopted—the Court adopts the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the Fourth Cohort of Expedited Class Members; will enter the Proposed Judgments for the Fourth Cohort of Expedited Class Members; expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay; and certifies the Proposed Judgments for the Fourth Cohort of Expedited Class Members as final and appealable pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York January 11, 2021 /s/ Kimba M. Wood KIMBA M. WOOD United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?