Gulino, et al v. Board of Education, et al

Filing 8577

JUDGMENT FOR MILDA BAILEY ANDROY BAILEY, ASADMINISTRATORSOF THE ESTATE OFCHRISTINE BAILEY: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the annexed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the Estate of Christine Bailey (Exhibit 1) is a dopted; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Milda Bailey and Roy Bailey, as Administrators of the Estate of Christine Bailey will have judgment against the BOE as follows: 1. Backpay in the amount of $1,057; 2. LAST Fees in the am ount of $510; 3. Pre-judgment interest calculated to be $464; and 4. Pension-related relief pursuant to the terms of the Court's Order dated December 17, 2018 (Pension Stipulation & Order, [ECF No. 1014]). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUD GED, AND DECREED that Milda Bailey and Roy Bailey, as Administrators of the Estate of Christine Bailey will be entitled to the following nonmonetary relief: 1. The BOE is ordered to amend its internal service, salary, payroll, and human resources s ystems as follows: a. Incorporate the "Pension Inputs" detailed in Paragraph 4 of Exhibit 1; and b. Incorporate Christine Bailey's counterfactual monthly service history, as listed on Exhibit B to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Milda Bailey and Roy Bailey, as Administrators of the Estate of Christine Bailey. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Court adopts the Special Master's recommendation that this judgment be certified as final and ap pealable pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) and expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay for the reasons stated in the Special Master's Report and Recommendation. This Judgment Entry is certified and entered by the Court pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 9/7/2021) (va) Modified on 9/10/2021 (va).

Download PDF
Case 1:96-cv-08414-KMW Document 8577 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------ELSA GULINO, MAYLING RALPH, PETER WILDS, and NIA GREENE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, x : : : : : Plaintiffs, : : - against : THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY SCHOOL : : DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, : Defendant. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- x 96 Civ. 8414 (KMW) [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT FOR MILDA BAILEY AND ROY BAILEY, AS ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF CHRISTINE BAILEY WHEREAS, the Court certified a remedy-phase class of Plaintiffs (See Gulino v. Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., Opinion and Order, No. 96-cv-8414, [ECF No. 386]), and prior to her death, Christine Bailey (“Claimant”) was a member of that class; WHEREAS, the Court appointed a Special Master (See May 20, 2014 Order of Appointment, [ECF No. 435]; November 12, 2014 Second Amended Order of Appointment, [ECF No. 524]) to hear, among other things, demands for damages; WHEREAS, Christine Bailey died on February 5, 2016, and on May 5, 2017, Milda Bailey and Roy Bailey were appointed by the Westchester County Surrogate’s Court as fiduciaries of Christine Bailey’s estate; WHEREAS, the Special Master held a hearing on February 7, 2020, with respect to the Estate of Christine Bailey’s demand for damages and Defendant’s objections, [ECF No. 4950]; WHEREAS, the Special Master made, and the Court adopted, Classwide Conclusions of Law, [ECF Nos. 999, 1008]); WHEREAS, the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York (“BOE”) and Plaintiffs entered into, and the Court so ordered, a Stipulation of Classwide Facts & Procedures, [ECF No. 1009]; WHEREAS, the BOE and Plaintiffs entered into, and the Court so ordered, a Sixth Supplemental Stipulation Concerning Admissibility of Exhibits, which attached a Sixth Supplemental Index of Exhibits (collectively referred to as the “Classwide Exhibits”) filed with the Court, [ECF No. 8247]; WHEREAS, the Special Master made Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the Estate of Christine Bailey, which the Special Master recommends that the Court adopt; 1 Case 1:96-cv-08414-KMW Document 8577 Filed 09/09/21 Page 2 of 2 WHEREAS, the Special Master recommended, and the parties agreed with the Special Master’s recommendation, that the Court certify this judgment as final and appealable pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b); IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the annexed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the Estate of Christine Bailey (Exhibit 1) is adopted; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Milda Bailey and Roy Bailey, as Administrators of the Estate of Christine Bailey will have judgment against the BOE as follows: 1. Backpay in the amount of $1,057; 2. LAST Fees in the amount of $510; 3. Pre-judgment interest calculated to be $464; and 4. Pension-related relief pursuant to the terms of the Court’s Order dated December 17, 2018 (Pension Stipulation & Order, [ECF No. 1014]). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Milda Bailey and Roy Bailey, as Administrators of the Estate of Christine Bailey will be entitled to the following nonmonetary relief: 1. The BOE is ordered to amend its internal service, salary, payroll, and human resources systems as follows: a. Incorporate the “Pension Inputs” detailed in Paragraph 4 of Exhibit 1; and b. Incorporate Christine Bailey’s counterfactual monthly service history, as listed on Exhibit B to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Milda Bailey and Roy Bailey, as Administrators of the Estate of Christine Bailey. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Court adopts the Special Master’s recommendation that this judgment be certified as final and appealable pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) and expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay for the reasons stated in the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation. This Judgment Entry is certified and entered by the Court pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dated: ____9/9/21____ ENTERED: /s/ Kimba M. Wood 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?