D. Klein & Son, Inc. v. Good Decision Inc., et al

Filing 108

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: I hereby confirm and adopt the well considered Report in its entirety. Accordingly, the motions are DENIED. (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 1/20/2009) (jpo)

UNITED STATES DfSTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK .................................. D. KLEIN & SON, INC.,

-X

.i

Plaintiff, -against GOOD DECISION, INC. and GOOD DECISION LTD. ,

98 Civ. 4083 (JFK) (MHD)

ORDER

Defendants.
JOHN F. REENAN, United S t a t e s District Judge:

The C o u r t has received a Report

&

Recommendation from

Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger, d a t e d December 24, 2008, recommending the d e n i a l of plaintiff's defendants1 motion f o r sanctions. ( D o c .
motion for contempt and

No.

94.)

As indicated
to
28

by

Magistrate
§

Judge

Dolinger

in h i s

Report,

pursuant

U.S.C.

636(b) (I) (C) and Rule 72 of t h e Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, t h e parties had t e n days in which to file objections. Having received no objections, and finding no c l e a r error on the
face of

the

record,

I

hereby

confirm

and

adopt

the

well618 F.

considered Report in its e n t i r e t y .
Supp. 1186, 1189

See Nelson v.

Smith,

(S.D.N.Y. 19853.

Accordingly, the motions are

DENIED.
SO

ORDERED.
New York, New York January 2 0 , 2 0 0 9

Dated:

V

JOm F. KEENAN United States D i r a t r i c t Judge