In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation
Filing
3795
DECLARATION of Brent H. Allen in Support re: (235 in 1:04-cv-04973-SAS) MOTION for Settlement Defendant Coastal Chem, Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion for Good Faith Settlement.. Document filed by Coastal Chem, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 01, #2 Exhibit 02, #3 Exhibit 03, #4 Exhibit 04, #5 Exhibit 05, #6 Exhibit 06, #7 Exhibit 07, #8 Exhibit 08, #9 Exhibit 09, #10 Exhibit 10)Filed In Associated Cases: 1:00-cv-01898-SAS-DCF, 1:04-cv-04973-SAS(Allen, Brent)
Exhibit 3
Case 1:00-cv-01898-SAS-DCF Document 3594
Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE")
Products Liability Litigation
This document relates to:
ORDER
Master File No. 1:00-1898
MDL 1358 (SAS)
M21-88
City ofFresno v. Chevron US.A. Inc., et al
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER # 108
(Trial Sites and Dismissed Sites)
On October 22,2003, Plaintiff City of Fresno filed its Complaint against Defendants
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., et ai, in the Superior Court for the State of California, San Francisco
County, alleging that Defendants were liable for contaminating the City of Fresno's public
drinking water supplies with MTBE and TBA.' The case was removed to federal court and
transferred to this court, where discovery and pretrial matters have been proceeding. After the
conclusion of all discovery related to Plaintiffs causes of action and the sources of the alleged
MTBE and TBA contamination, on August 16, 2012 at the Status Conference the Court ordered
Plaintiff to identify (a) the sites at which Plaintiff will pursue claims at trial and the Defendants
against which it will assert those claims for each site, (b) the sites at which Plaintiff is dismissing
all claims with prejudice, and (c) the sites at which Plaintiff is dismissing all claims, but at which
the Parties dispute whether the dismissal should be with or without prejudice. On October 5,
2012, Plaintiff served a revised station matrix identifying these three categories.
After considering the foregoing, the revised station matrix, and the arguments of counsel,
it is hereby ORDERED that:
Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on October 28, 2004.
SMRH:407633906.1
-1
Case 1:00-cv-01898-SAS-DCF Document 3594
A.
Filed 01/02/13 Page 2 of 4
Plaintiff may only assert claims at trial for the following sites and only against the
Defendant(s) identified for each site. This matrix may be modified to delete sites and/or
Defendants, but cannot be revised to add sites and/or Defendants. 2
i
M & S Texaco, 2619 S. East Avenue
. Kern Oil, Lyondell, Shell
I Chevron, Coastal, ConocoPhillips, Kern Oil,
I Lyondell
• Tosco #30587, 1610 N. Palm
;
7-Eleven #19198, 1596 N. Palm Avenue
Citgo
i
Valley Gas, 2139 South Elm Street
Arco, Duke, Kern Oil, Tesoro, Valero
I
Chevron #9-4374, 1160 Fresno Street
i
I
I
hheu (1212), 1212 Fresno St~eet
i
Chevron, Coastal, Kern Oil, Lyondell
Kern Oil, Lyondell, Shell
Unoc~#6353, l418E.Shaw~~~~~~~i~c-h-e-v-ro-n-,-c-o-a-~-a-I,-c~0-n-o-c-oP-h~i~II-~-s-,K-·-ern~O~l-·~~~
i
LyondeU
U&A Gas & Food Mart, 2929 N.
• Ratcliff Gas, 2145 Blackstone
~on #537,798 West Gettysburg, Clovis
I
i Arco, Valero
Gilbert's Exxon, 4142 Ea_s_tC~hu_r_c_h~~__~--l-IC_oastal, Exxon, Lyondell
~an
Ness Auto, 2740 North Van Ness
i
: Smith Tank Lines (Former Carey Oil), 30 E.
~ivisadero Street
i
' Red Triangle, 2809 South Chestnut Aven.ue
Chevron, Coastal, Duke, Kern Oil, LyondeU
: Duke, Kern Oil, Valero
i
Coastal, Duke, Exxon, Kern Oil, Lyondell,
_ _-+-1~N_el_Ia, New West, Tesoro, Valero
I
~evron #9-9093, 3996 N. Parkway Drive
Tosco #39118, 1605 N. Cedar
I
i Chevron, Coastal, Kern Oil, Lyondell
Chevron, Coastal, ConocoPhilIips, Kern Oil,
I Lyondell
i
. Arco, Duke, Kern Oil, Valero
Beacon #3519, 4591 E. Belmont Avenue
~~----------------~------------~I----------~-------------------~
Beacon-Arco #615, 1625 Chestnut Avenue
i Arco, Duke,
2
Notwithstanding the Parties' agreement to present this proposed Order to the Court,
Defendants make no admissions as to the accuracy of the matrix, dispute Plaintiffs designation
of particular Defendants at particular sites, and dispute and deny the claims asserted at all sites.
SMRH:407633906.!
-2
Case 1:00-cv-01898-SAS-DCF Document 3594
Filed 01/02/13 Page 3 of 4
I Exxon Servi~e Station, 4594 East Tulare Street ! Arco, Coastal, Duke, Exxon, Kern Oil,
Lyondell, Valero
17-Eleven#13917, 3645 Olive Avenue
B.
Citgo
The following sites shall be dismissed with prejudice.
~:~!t~~~~:"E~~~
i Avenue
: Former Unocal, 794 W. Shaw, Clovis
i
Arco #610, 4192 North Fresno Street
i Gas 4 Less, 3076 East Gettysburg
Classic Car Wash, 5785 N. First
Beacon Fifth Wheel Truck Stop, 3767
South Golden State
Cor-O-Lite Block, inc., 4569 East Florence
. Avenue
I J&C Food & Gas, 2394 South Elm Avenue
C.
i
I
I
After hearing argument of counsel, the Court gave Plaintiff the option to either dismiss
the following sites with prejudice or pay the costs Defendants incurred with respect to these sites.
After having been provided a good faith estimate of those costs, Plaintiff elected not to pay such
costs. Plaintiff has agreed to dismiss these sites, but believes they should be dismissed without
prejudice. Based on the arguments of counsel and the relevant legal authorities, the Court hereby
orders that the following sites shall be dismissed with prejudice.
Family Express Food & Liquor, 4205 E .
• Butler Avenue
I G&K Mini Mart, 4090 South Chestnut
I Whirlwind Car Wash, 225 North H Street
i Unocal, 101 N. Roosevelt
SMRH:407633906.!
-3
Case 1:00-cv-01898-SAS-DCF Document 3594
Filed 01/02/13 Page 4 of 4
Dave's Exxon, 1703 W. Olive
Shell, 1014 E. Bullard
C.
The Order of Dismissal is attached as Exhibit A.
SO ORDERED:
. a A. Scheindlin
DATED:
SMRH:407633906.1
New York, New York
January 02, 2013
-4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?