In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation

Filing 3930

DECLARATION of Michael A. Walsh in Support re: (364 in 1:07-cv-10470-SAS, 34 in 1:14-cv-01014-SAS, 3927 in 1:00-cv-01898-SAS-DCF) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.. Document filed by Tauber Oil. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I)Filed In Associated Cases: 1:00-cv-01898-SAS-DCF, 1:07-cv-10470-SAS, 1:14-cv-01014-SAS(Walsh, Michael)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT C Donald M. Sitton FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE: METHYL TERTIARY BUTYL ETHER ("MT PRODUCTS LIABILI LITIGATION MASTER FI NO. 1:00-1898 M21-88 MDL 1358(SAS) This Document Relates to: COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL. PLAINTIFF, CASE NO. 07-CIV-I0470 (SAS) VS. SHELL OIL CO., ET AL., DEFENDANTS. DEPOSITION OF DONALD M. SITTON SEPTEMBER 5, 2013 VOLUME 1 Called as a witness by counsel for the Plaintiffs, taken before Dorothy A. Rull, CSR, CRR, a Certified Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public In and for the State of Texas, on the 5th day of September, 2013, from 9:04 a.m. to 12:34 p.m., at the law offices of Norton Rose Fulbright, 1301 McKinney, Suite 5100, Houston, Texas 77010, pursuant to Notice and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Golkow Technologies, Inc. - 1.877.370.DEPS Donald M. Sitton Page 26 1 2 Well -- okay. Q. through Well, a couple more. Mixed xylenes. 3 4 that was brought 5 was that a product 6 chemical 7 plant, mixed 9 into the plant xylenes purchase it. Was that something from off island or that you manufactured We could -- if we could purchase at a good price, we could -- we could But in the conversion 10 also produced 11 Q. mixed MTBE. 12 I -- I believe, 13 manufacture at the Core? Both. A. 8 let me just go of naphtha, you xylenes. It would be a correct that the Core facility statement, did not its own MTBE? 14 A. That's correct. 15 Q. SO the purchase 16 source, was that a function 17 facility? of MTBE from whatever of anybody 18 A. Not that I recall. 19 Q. So, again, 20 A. I think Bartlesville at the Core 21 22 23 24 that would be Bartlesville? had more to do with purchasing. Q. Now, would were the number A. Golkow it be fair to say that you 2 guy? Yes. Technologies, Inc. - 1.877.370.DEPS Donald M. Sitton Page 40 1 Q. And then Bartlesville 2 that product 3 A. Correct. 4 Q. -- to wherever 5 A. Correct. 6 Q. arranged to have shipped the eventual purchaser -- was? MS. FARLEY: 7 Objection. Form. Correct. 8 A. 9 BY MR. DEMA: Now, the Core facility also had a 10 Q. 11 loading rack; right? 12 A. Correct. 13 Q. And were you In charge of -- or someone 14 below you in charge 15 16 A. maintain 17 Q. We of maintaining -- my maintenance the loading the loading department rack? would rack. And how did you know what trucks 18 going to come up with lift tickets 19 were to the loading rack? 20 A. I didn't. 21 Q. Who did? 22 A. Mr . 23 Q. Do you know if Mr. Alberto 24 Sola. Sola today? Golkow Technologies, Inc. - 1.877.370.DEPS lS alive

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?